evaluation of a person's work or performance by a group of people in the same occupation, profession, or industry.
the evaluation by fellow specialists of research that someone has done in order to assess its suitability for publication or further development
Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition
2009 © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009
The peer review element is what separates a thesis or dissertation from a publication.
Simply going through the submissions to determine what is appropriate to send on to peer review requires paid employees.
The peer review system doesn't really accept it, isn't happy with pure discovery.
Strong national leadership backed by regional peer review offers a powerful combination to improve the performance of governments.
For years the profession has insisted that self-regulation and peer review are the right way to maintain standards.
It applies an unusual form of peer review to a process which traditionally involves only a patent applicant and an examiner.
Science has also evolved in this way, using individual contributions subject to peer review.
Experience shows that the best form of peer review is a frequent change of reviewer.
The scientific peer review process is not sufficient.
The commission said budget plans and economic reforms should be subject to peer review before they reach national parliaments.
The next best opinion is a peer review or failing that the head of the school.
The government has lots of ways of giving money to worthy science art, etc that involve peer review.
And it surely hampers writing up the findings for scientific peer review and for wider public dissemination.
In my field, non peer review research such as working papers don't count for tenure or promotion.
My new grading method, which set off such waves of vitriol, combined old-fashioned contract grading with peer review.
Peer review became the new standard for evaluation for publication, along with external review for promotion.
In academia, it's all about peer review and criticism.
Journal refereeing is one of the key elements of peer review.
It was precisely this moment's grace from the pressure of constant peer review that gave me the liberty to try something new.
Submitting it to a journal, even if it was rejected, would familiarize me with peer review.
Lecture capture is being used as not only a way to facilitate anytime, anywhere learning but also as a peer review system.
The common answer of peer review does not meet the requirement.
Ultimately the peer review system as it stands is on it's last legs anyway.
In fact it is a wonderful demonstration of peer review.
Arsenic isn't so much a story about post-publication peer review but instead of post-publication peer review in the open.
All three are among the projects pulled from peer review.
We might ask how this paper managed to get through peer review.
When research lacks peer review, blame the journal editors who publish it and then adjust the publication standards.
There must be some responsibility attached to peer review, and at the moment there is none.
According to that logic, there's no point in peer review or having major scientific bodies or even higher education.
To make a call on the existence of a parallel universe requires scientific evidence and a peer review of that evidence.
Consensus starts with peer review and builds from there.
They asked other scientists what they think, a process called peer review.
The system, known as peer review, is now considered a linchpin of science.
Peer review, the mainstream media, and government agencies have landed us in a ditch.
He sent his draft to a prestigious biology journal, which sent it out to three scientists for peer review.
The forensic science community needs more peer review.
But they derive from recognized social scientific methods and are vetted by the academic peer review process.
The first drug targeting telomeres, now sold as a nutritional supplement, will soon face the harsh light of peer review.
There's complete sunshine on the findings and evidence, with an open call for peer review.
So, the peer review process is flawed, but no-one has yet thought up a better way to do it.
He may not be correct, but that's a matter to be hammered out using science and peer review.
Engaging in scientific reasoning with peer review prevents false rationalization.
Its about probabilities and data that will stand up to peer review and results that can be replicated time and time again.
Amazingly not subject to the ordinary scientific demands of reproduction in other labs, or peer review publication.
The peer review serves several roles, although the precise combination varies with the type of review.